International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
Vol.4, No.3, September 2015, pp. 130~137
ISSN: 2252-8822 130
Journal homepage: http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE
Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
Fauziah Hj Yahya, Abdul Rahim Bin Hamdan, Hafsah Binti Jantan, Halimatussadiah Binti Saleh Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history: Received Aug 15, 2015
Revised Aug 29, 2015
Accepted Aug 31, 2015
Keyword: ANOVA,CIPP,PISMP Science Curriculum,Teaching Experience Copyright © 2015 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.
Corresponding Author:
Fauziah Hj Yahya,
Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Email: gieyahya@gmail.com
Vol.4, No.3, September 2015, pp. 130~137
ISSN: 2252-8822 130
Journal homepage: http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE
Perspective of Lecturers in Implementing PISMP Science Curriculum in Malaysia’s IPG
Fauziah Hj Yahya, Abdul Rahim Bin Hamdan, Hafsah Binti Jantan, Halimatussadiah Binti Saleh Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history: Received Aug 15, 2015
Revised Aug 29, 2015
Accepted Aug 31, 2015
The article aims to identify lecturers’ perspectives in implementing PISMP
science curriculum in IPG Malaysia based on teaching experience with KIPP
model. The respondents consisted of 105 lecturers from 20 IPG Malaysia.
The study used a questionnaire consisting of 74 items covering the four
dimensions (Context, Input, Process and Product). Data collected through
questionnaires were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The study found that
there was not a significant difference of curriculum goals and course
objectives based on teaching experience at school. For input dimension, there
was no significant difference of evaluation, content, source and pedagogy
based on school teaching experience. In process dimension, there was no
significant difference pedagogical process, the content and the process of
assessment based on teaching experience at school. Furthermore, there was
no significant difference of product dimension of science curriculum based
on teaching experience at school. Based on the experience of teaching in
IPG, lecturers did not have a significant difference of curriculum goals,
course objectives, evaluation input, content, source, pedagogy, and
evaluation process, and content process, but there were significant
differences in the pedagogical input and product in the implementation of the
PISMP science curriculum in IPG. Its discussions and recommendation were
also discussed in this article.
Keyword: ANOVA,CIPP,PISMP Science Curriculum,Teaching Experience Copyright © 2015 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.
Corresponding Author:
Fauziah Hj Yahya,
Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Email: gieyahya@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment